Bill Gates’ Patents for Hurricane Control EXPOSED Amid Hurricane Milton’s Looming Threat
A weather satellite captures Hurricane Milton spinning in the Gulf of Mexico. (Satellite image via NOAA, Graphic by The Desk)
In the aftermath of Hurricane Helene and the approaching Hurricane Milton, the following video is evidence of the powers involved in manipulating natural disasters for potentially controversial purposes. The video titled Hurricane Milton: Bill Gates’ Hurricane Control Patents EXPOSED claims to reveal startling information regarding Bill Gates’ alleged patents aimed at controlling hurricanes. This revelation calls into question the ethics and motivations behind such technological capabilities. Can weather truly be controlled, and more importantly, should it be?
The video in question presents evidence that dates back to 2009, a time when Bill Gates and a team of climate scientists, including Ken Caldeira, submitted five patent applications to the US Patent and Trademark Office. These patents, made public on July 9, 2009, (Discover, Marine Link, Google Patents, and IP Watchdog), proposed the manipulation of ocean temperatures to weaken hurricanes. The system aimed to use barges equipped with turbines to pump cold water from the ocean’s depths into the warmer surface layers, theoretically diminishing the strength of these massive storms.
The patents, which focus on atmospheric management, weather control, and hurricane suppression, are not limited to just these methods. As pointed out in the video transcript, phrases like “not limited to” spark concern over the broader implications of such technology. These patents could allow for hurricane intensity modulation and even deflection, raising the question of who controls this technology and how it may be used beyond its initial intentions.
Sceptics and experts alike have weighed in on the matter. While climate scientist Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University admits the feasibility of such technology, he also acknowledges that it would require an enormous scale to be effective. However, many meteorologists and scientists remain dubious about the practicalities and potential consequences of artificially tampering with weather systems.
In 2010, geoengineering researcher Dr. Elia Peringer made headlines for linking weather modification to wider environmental impacts, warning that military and corporate entities had long been experimenting with controlling the weather. According to Peringer, these efforts go far beyond cloud seeding— a practice once used to induce rain during droughts or suppress precipitation at large-scale events like the Beijing Olympics. She raised the alarm on secretive programmes conducted by the US military, with the goal of controlling global weather patterns by 2025.
Adding fuel to the fire, the video touches on growing concerns about the potential health impacts of geoengineering. Programmes such as “Chemtrails,” often dismissed as conspiracy theories, are highlighted for their connection to Bill Gates’ patents. The video claims that weather modification efforts, including spraying chemicals into the atmosphere, have been linked to a rise in respiratory illnesses and other health problems worldwide.
If true, the ramifications of such technologies extend beyond hurricanes and into a future where global elites might manipulate natural phenomena to their advantage. The question remains—what happens when natural disasters become assets controlled by private entities?
The evidence presented in this video raises critical ethical and environmental questions. Is it possible that hurricane control patents and weather modification programmes are more widespread than the public knows? With Hurricane Milton on the horizon and history’s lessons from storms like Katrina, the reality of manipulating weather patterns is no longer confined to science fiction. As these patents exist, the pressing concern is: who will decide when and how to use such powerful technology, and what are the broader implications for humanity?
