Cape Town’s WorldPride 2028: A Misguided Use of Taxpayer Money in a Time of Crisis

Stop-Pride-Needs

In 2028, Cape Town will make history by becoming the first African city to host WorldPride, a landmark event in the global LGBTQIA+ movement. While the event promises to bring significant international attention and celebrate diversity, its timing raises critical concerns. Given South Africa’s urgent socio-economic and infrastructural challenges, many question whether this is the most responsible use of taxpayer money. With the country’s basic services such as infrastructure, electricity, water, and food security in dire need of improvement, hosting WorldPride could be seen as a misplaced priority. The event not only diverts attention from essential needs but also carries moral and biblical implications that should not be ignored.

The UN’s Agenda and Open Society’s Influence
In addition to the concerns surrounding local priorities, it is important to recognize the broader geopolitical context in which this event is being funded. The United Nations, heavily influenced by organizations like George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, has been a significant force behind the global LGBTQIA+ movement, advancing policies that align with progressive social agendas. The UN’s agenda, backed by funding from Open Society, aims to promote LGBTQIA+ rights worldwide, with South Africa being a key player in this agenda. While such movements advocate for global inclusivity, the imposition of these ideals through international funding, including the event in Cape Town, raises concerns about the sovereignty of local governance and the alignment of public resources with external pressures.

The Cost of Global Visibility Over Local Needs
Cape Town’s decision to host WorldPride highlights a stark contradiction. The city is grappling with significant challenges in its water system, ongoing rolling blackouts, and general infrastructural collapse. Citizens continue to experience daily struggles due to inefficient services and a lack of basic needs. Despite these pressing issues, public funds will be allocated toward organizing an international event. While the LGBTQIA+ community certainly deserves acknowledgement for its contributions to society, the decision to prioritize such an event over addressing immediate and life-sustaining issues seems irresponsible.

Biblical Arguments Against LGBTQIA+ Celebrations
From a biblical standpoint, the celebration of LGBTQIA+ pride contradicts long-established moral teachings. Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 both condemn homosexual acts, describing them as abominations. The Bible is clear in its disapproval of such practices, stating, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination” (Leviticus 18:22). Additionally, Romans 1:26-27 reinforces this viewpoint, warning that engaging in homosexual behaviour dishonours the body and leads to a depraved mind. The destruction of Sodom, as recounted in Ezekiel 16:49-50, serves as a biblical cautionary tale. The city’s sinful behaviour, including pride and sexual immorality, led to its downfall. From a biblical perspective, Cape Town’s celebration of WorldPride could be interpreted as an endorsement of acts deemed sinful in the eyes of God.

The Moral Argument for Stewardship and Responsibility
Cape Town’s decision to host WorldPride, when viewed through the lens of biblical stewardship, seems a grave misallocation of resources. In times of crisis, the faithful are urged to prioritize the welfare of the poor and needy, not grand spectacles that promote prideful and sinful behaviour. The biblical teachings on stewardship, especially in regard to caring for the most vulnerable in society, point to the need for greater focus on rebuilding basic infrastructure, securing water supplies, and addressing the country’s energy crisis. These are the pressing needs that demand attention, rather than a celebration that may alienate a significant portion of the population due to its moral implications.

Unity or Division? The Risk of Alienating Citizens
In a diverse nation like South Africa, where a wide range of religious and cultural groups hold traditional views on sexuality, Cape Town’s hosting of WorldPride risks further division. The event, while promoting inclusivity on one hand, may inadvertently exclude those who hold moral or religious objections to the LGBTQIA+ agenda. Ignoring the discomfort or opposition of a substantial portion of the population sends a message of exclusion, undermining the very inclusivity that the event purports to celebrate.

Conclusion: A Call for Responsible Resource Allocation
While the LGBTQIA+ community deserves respect and dignity, the decision to host WorldPride 2028 in Cape Town, particularly given South Africa’s critical infrastructure needs, represents a significant misallocation of taxpayer funds. The biblical narrative clearly disapproves of the behaviours celebrated by such an event, viewing them as sinful and destructive to societal morals. Instead of directing public funds toward this global spectacle, the city should focus on addressing the fundamental needs of its citizens, such as reliable water, electricity, and infrastructure. By doing so, Cape Town can truly serve the most vulnerable in society, fulfilling its moral duty as a city and as a nation.

The influence of the United Nations and Open Society’s funding behind global LGBTQIA+ agendas underscores the external pressures that shape such decisions. While these movements push for social change on a global scale, it is essential to weigh the consequences of aligning with foreign-driven agendas at the expense of local priorities and moral convictions. In the end, the needs of Cape Town’s citizens should come first, not the promotion of an agenda that many consider contrary to their values.

error: Content is protected !!