11 December 2024

Uncovering the Truth: MSM’s Unexpected Revelation About Global Warming

climate-change-alarmism

In recent years, particularly during mid-July when the Northern Hemisphere swelters, mainstream media headlines have hyped up each “hottest day on record,” bolstered by climate alarmist journalists relying on dubious studies. This timely narrative coincides conveniently with summer heatwaves, painting a bleak picture of a planet on the brink of combustion unless drastic measures are taken — cue increased climate taxes, ‘carbon credits,’ bans on cow flatulence, petrol vehicle sales, and hefty bills to import more solar panels from China.

However, the myopic focus of corporate media conveniently skips the broader historical context — an essential perspective when discussing climate change—which unravels their narrative over longer timelines.

And then there’s this:

Not to mention the absurd claims of the earth’s age being millions of years old, contradicting the claims of the Bible and the earth’s true age being a little over 6000 years. No one living today was around then, nor had they the technology to capture such absurd, made-up statistics.

Indeed, when the Washington Post recently attempted to chart global temperatures over the past 485 million years, they stumbled upon a surprising revelation. In 2023, Earth’s average temperature stood at 58.96°F (14.98°C), significantly cooler than the 96.8°F (36°C) average recorded approximately 100 million years ago. This long-term trend indicates a gradual cooling over the past 50 million years.

But instead of delving into this expansive historical perspective, mainstream media fixates on recent spikes, often supported by questionable data.

Increasingly, voices within the scientific community are challenging the accuracy of temperature readings, suggesting that the trillions invested in climate change mitigation efforts may be based on exaggerated or nonexistent threats.

According to meteorologist Anthony Watts, over 90% of NOAA’s temperature monitoring stations exhibit a heat bias, rendering much of their data unreliable. Attempts to correct this bias, he argues, fall short due to its pervasive influence on the dataset.

Could it be that the doomsday scenario painted by governments, corporate media, NGOs, and wealthy activists is not as catastrophic as they proclaim?

Perhaps, as suspected, the fervent actions of environmental activists, from vandalising private property to disrupting public infrastructure, are driven more by blind faith than by scientific rigour.

Critical Questions Remain: Is the Climate Change Agenda Built on Shaky Foundations?

Here’s what X users are saying about WaPo’s latest revelations: [Expose the lies in the climate change narrative].

 

error: Content is protected !!