Vote Count Delays Fuel Election Integrity Doubts
It would appear that former Obama Attorney-General Eric Holder’s assertion that the 2024 election’s arrangements are “secure” is contradicted by the narrative being developed by the mass media and swing state officials that there will be delays in producing the result.
A secure election process should not be troubled in advance by delays. Yet Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, has stated that while 75% of Georgia’s election results will have been counted by dawn of November 6, the other 25% will be delayed for three days awaiting the arrival of ballots from overseas.
His excuse has severe credibility constraints for two reasons: One is that a quarter of Georgia’s voters do not live overseas. In any case, voters residing overseas had advance notice to arrange casting their votes, so they should have arrived timeously.
Overseas votes for the May 29 South African election were timeously received and the overall election outcome was known the following day.
By concurring with Georgia’s excuse for delaying the finalisation of their vote counts, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania are fuelling doubts about election integrity.
